By William Gibson
William Gibson actually created the now familiar word “Cyberspace”. His wrote a series of novels including Neuromancer and Count Zero that describe a dystopian future where hackers connect to that cyberspace with a cable to the brain, where corporations have overtaken states in terms of power and influence, and where artificial intelligences have sparked to life and start to influence human history. These books are not for children, containing significant levels of graphic violence and intimate sex scenes.
Gibson, in his last three books, seems to have abandoned this brooding universe and is now writing entrancing tales of the near future. Perhaps he has come to the view that the future is now jostling the present! I have read and re-read Pattern Recognition, and it is on my list of personal favourites. Gibson no longer feels the need to spice up his gripping and beautifully written tales with intense violence, sex and substance abuse. In this book we meet Cayce, whose very marketable ability is a deep sensitivity to brands and icons. She is asked to come to London to assess a proposed new logo. Her personal obsession, however, is “The Footage”... tiny fragments of perfectly realised and evocative video clips that are being slowly released via the internet. Like others she is fascinated by the mystery of who creates these, and what secrets are hidden within them.
This is almost not a Sci Fi read, though any William Gibson fan will not be disappointed. It is rich with ideas. Gibson constantly seems to trawl through the intellectual flotsam and jetsam of our world and to pick up fascinating concepts and predictions that others miss, then weaves them deep into his stories. He is a writer who can also produce heart catching metaphors and phrases.
This book would suit adults and older teens with some intellectual curiosity. It comes from a master story teller and in some will find it a less confronting read than his earlier novels.
Reviews on books in the Odell Learning Resources Centre, moderated by Andrew Lack for Pacific Hills Christian School.
Monday, November 29, 2010
Monday, November 1, 2010
Why Can’t Elephants Jump
and 101 other questions
compiled and edited by Mick O'Hare, New Scientist
This book appeals on all sorts of levels. It is great for the curious, excellent for those interested in Science, valuable for the hoarders of trivia, and a good “dip in” book (i.e. one you can read in random chunks). I was only a few pages in when I recognised some familiar material. The reason is that I regularly read New Scientist, and the whole book is drawn from the back pages of that magazine... in particular the section where readers pose questions and other (well informed) readers answer them.
I was interested in the section on why Bond required martinis to be “shaken not stirred”... a number of complex theories were proposed and courageously tested. Other questions arise from natural curiosity (“Why are there no green mammals?”) or from keen and well informed observation (“why is the moon as bright as a cloud in the daytime sky when their albedos are quite different?”)
Some of the answer are whimsical and playful, but alongside these there is always an attempt at a good science based answer. In some cases readers propose a variety of explanations, and a sample of these is often given, leaving the reader of the book the job of deciding which is the most satisfactory account.
The material is fine for any age (unless you are worried by the martinis). The explanations range from the general (perhaps Middle School and up) and the reasonably technical.
review by Andrew Lack
compiled and edited by Mick O'Hare, New Scientist
This book appeals on all sorts of levels. It is great for the curious, excellent for those interested in Science, valuable for the hoarders of trivia, and a good “dip in” book (i.e. one you can read in random chunks). I was only a few pages in when I recognised some familiar material. The reason is that I regularly read New Scientist, and the whole book is drawn from the back pages of that magazine... in particular the section where readers pose questions and other (well informed) readers answer them.
I was interested in the section on why Bond required martinis to be “shaken not stirred”... a number of complex theories were proposed and courageously tested. Other questions arise from natural curiosity (“Why are there no green mammals?”) or from keen and well informed observation (“why is the moon as bright as a cloud in the daytime sky when their albedos are quite different?”)
Some of the answer are whimsical and playful, but alongside these there is always an attempt at a good science based answer. In some cases readers propose a variety of explanations, and a sample of these is often given, leaving the reader of the book the job of deciding which is the most satisfactory account.
The material is fine for any age (unless you are worried by the martinis). The explanations range from the general (perhaps Middle School and up) and the reasonably technical.
review by Andrew Lack
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)